• Email : patentiger@gmail.com
  • 服務據點 : Tokyo｜Taipei｜London｜Washington D.C.

DTSN Global Alliance 是一所結合法律、科技與戰略思維的跨國精品事務所。
我們協助企業解構複雜的跨國法律問題、整合法務與技術資訊，並以高精度分析支援高層決策，加速全球事業佈局。

Contact Info

+(886) 2-2843-661

+(886) 2-8710-594

patentiger@gmail.com

Tokyo｜Taipei｜London｜Washington D.C.

Why It Matters

Why Do Companies Need Cross-Border Team Support?

  • Jurisdictional differences can lead to dramatically different legal outcomes

    Including injunction risks, high damages exposure in the United States, and highly technical review standards in Japan.

  • Any company engaged in cross-border economic activity will face international policy impacts

    Industries such as AI, semiconductors, and data flows are fundamentally policy-driven.

  • Global supply chains interconnect legal issues across multiple jurisdictions

    A problem in one jurisdiction can trigger cascading cross-border effects.

  • Early-stage international collaboration reduces legal and technical risks

    And we are responsible for integrating such collaboration into a single optimal solution.

How We Work Together with our Clients in Global Business?

How Do We Collaborate with Enterprises in Cross-Border Matters?

Members of DTSN Global Alliance are experienced in acting as the following roles in global engagements:

✔ Integrators

✔ Translators (across technology / law / culture)

✔ Strategic Architects

We Make Global Law Firm–Enterprise Collaboration Simple

Companies often hold fragmented, multi-jurisdictional information
(technology, legal positions, cultural differences)
DTSN Global Alliance consolidates everything into a unified framework
(single point of contact, eliminating inconsistencies)
All technical assumptions → unified by DTSN Global Alliance
All legal perspectives → coordinated by DTSN Global Alliance
All decision-making materials → prepared by DTSN Global Alliance
All risk discrepancies → resolved by DTSN Global Alliance

Companies no longer need to navigate between multiple law firms across jurisdictions on their own.

Scenario:

A U.S.-listed technology company receives patent infringement warnings from Europe and Japan shortly before launching a new product. The company’s legal department receives completely divergent opinions from three international law firms:

  • U.S. counsel: High infringement risk
  • Japanese counsel: Moderate risk, with a reasonable chance of success
  • German counsel: High likelihood of injunction
The Company’s Dilemma:
  • Significant jurisdictional divergence
  • Senior management unable to make a decision
  • Product launch timeline at risk (potential losses in the tens of millions of U.S. dollars)
How We Addressed It:
  • Integrated legal perspectives from the U.S., Japan, and Europe
  • Reconstructed the product’s technical architecture
  • Conducted claim-by-claim patent comparison and built an infringement matrix
  • Provided three viable solutions, including design-around options
Outcome:
  • Board-level decision reached within 10 minutes
  • Product launched on schedule
  • Litigation risk reduced by 70%

Scenario:

An AI company plans to expand into the European market but discovers that its data-processing workflow implicates multiple requirements under the GDPR and the AI Act.

The Company’s Dilemma:
  • Engineering teams do not understand legal requirements
  • Legal teams cannot interpret data flows
  • Communication breakdown between teams
  • Product launch timeline at risk
How We Addressed It:
  • Data Flow Reconstruction
  • Translated GDPR / AI Act legal requirements into technical specifications
  • Identified data-flow differences across Taiwan, Europe, and Japan
  • Provided three viable system-architecture modification options
Outcome:
  • Engineering teams adjusted systems based on legal requirements
  • Legal teams gained full visibility into system risks
  • Product successfully passed compliance review and launched on schedule

Scenario:

A Japanese semiconductor company plans to enter the U.S. market but is concerned about potential U.S. patent assertions.

The Company’s Dilemma:
  • Extensive patent families
  • Highly complex technologies
  • Traditional FTO reports fail to provide actionable guidance
How We Addressed It:
  • Reconstructed the product’s functional tree
  • Identified high-risk functional modules
  • Proposed two alternative design-around strategies
  • Analyzed impact on cost, performance, and time-to-market
Outcome:
  • Costs reduced by 30%
  • Feasibility of design-around significantly improved
  • Product successfully entered a new market

Scenario:

A major communications enterprise plans to acquire a European AI smart-factory company.

The Company’s Dilemma:
  • Highly complex technologies (AI / IoT / Robotics)
  • Difficulty integrating legal and technical risks
  • Divergent regulatory requirements across the U.S., Japan, and the EU
How We Addressed It:
  • Established a cross-jurisdictional regulatory integration matrix
  • Analyzed AI model dependency structures of the target company
  • Quantified technology implementation risks and legal exposure
  • Provided post-merger technology and regulatory roadmaps
Outcome:
  • Acquisition value and risks quantified
  • Acquirer successfully negotiated improved transaction terms
  • Post-merger operations proceeded smoothly

Scenario:

A Taiwanese technology company works with three international law firms simultaneously but receives conflicting legal opinions.

The Company’s Dilemma:
  • Unable to determine which conclusion is correct
  • Legal and engineering teams unable to align
  • Management demands a single, definitive company position
How We Addressed It:
  • Analyzed all law-firm opinions and identified points of divergence
  • Established unified technical assumptions
  • Consolidated conclusions into a board-ready “best version”
  • Provided three executable alternative options
Outcome:
  • Company clearly articulated why a specific conclusion was adopted
  • Collaboration costs reduced by 60%
  • Significantly improved coordination between legal and engineering teams

Take Actions

If your company is facing cross-border integration challenges involving law, patents, technology, and regulation,
DTSN Global Alliance offers a proven methodology and a global network of experts to support you.

Contact us today